1D0-610 · Question #65
You want to enable wireless security on your Android device and your Linux system. Which of the following is a disadvantage of Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)?
The correct answer is B. It is easily compromised by hackers. WEP is correct answer B because it uses a static, shared encryption key with a weak RC4 cipher implementation - security researchers demonstrated in the early 2000s that WEP keys can be cracked in minutes using freely available tools, making it effectively useless as a security…
Question
You want to enable wireless security on your Android device and your Linux system. Which of the following is a disadvantage of Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)?
Options
- AIt enables MAC address filtering.
- BIt is easily compromised by hackers.
- CIt only supports 56-bit symmetric-key encryption.
- DIt is based on the outdated 802.lla wireless standard.
How the community answered
(59 responses)- A2% (1)
- B95% (56)
- C3% (2)
Explanation
WEP is correct answer B because it uses a static, shared encryption key with a weak RC4 cipher implementation - security researchers demonstrated in the early 2000s that WEP keys can be cracked in minutes using freely available tools, making it effectively useless as a security protocol.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A - MAC address filtering is a separate, independent feature of wireless routers, not a feature or flaw of WEP itself.
- C - WEP supports 40-bit or 104-bit keys (sometimes marketed as 64-bit or 128-bit with the IV included), not 56-bit; 56-bit is associated with DES encryption.
- D - WEP is defined in the 802.11b standard (and later applied to others), not 802.11a; it's outdated, but the reason to avoid it is its cryptographic weakness, not the wireless standard it's tied to.
Memory tip: Think "WEP = Weak Encryption Protocol" - the acronym swap reminds you that its core flaw is being easily broken, which is exactly why WPA2/WPA3 replaced it.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.