A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network.Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see "intercept/localkernel/icore.c:1463] nat_check: SYN packet for already NAT'd connection 100.100.100.33:1611 - 100.200.200.32:80 == 100.201.201.25:7801".All connections are showing up optimized but the logs persist.Given the exhibit, what is the likely problem?

Question

A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network.Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see "intercept/localkernel/icore.c:1463] nat_check: SYN packet for already NAT'd connection 100.100.100.33:1611 -> 100.200.200.32:80 ==> 100.201.201.25:7801".All connections are showing up optimized but the logs persist.Given the exhibit, what is the likely problem?

Accepted Answer

E. Packet Ricochet

Answer

A. Lost Opportunistic Lock

Answer

B. SMB Signing

Answer

C. Fixed-target rule is needed

Answer

D. Asymmetric Route

A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network.Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see "intercept/localkernel/icore.c:1463] nat_check: SYN…

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Community Discussion