Multiple SGs can exist in a Dual Site environment. Each SG can be configured in one of three ways. Which is not one of those ways?

Question

Options

• ATwo MHOs connected to two MHOs via load balancers.
• BTwo MHOs at same site connected to remote site MHOs via two different switches.
• CTwo MHOs at same site connected to remote site MHOs via single switch.
• DDirect connectivity between Remote Site MHOs.

• A
  81% (21)
• B
  4% (1)
• C
  4% (1)
• D
  12% (3)

Explanation

This is not one of the ways to configure a Security Group in a Dual Site environment, because load balancers are not required or supported for the inter-site communication between the Maestro Orchestrators (MHOs). The MHOs use the Site-Sync port and VLANs to synchronize the resources and connections across the sites. The three valid scenarios for Dual Site configuration - Direct connectivity between remote site Orchestrators: This scenario requires two orchestrators, one for each site, and a direct connection between them using the site-sync port. ?Two orchestrators on the same site are connected to the remote site orchestrators through two different switches: This scenario requires four orchestrators, two for each site, and a connection between them using the site-sync port and two external switches that support QinQ and MTU - Two orchestrators on the same site are connected to the remote site orchestrators through one switch: This scenario also requires four orchestrators, two for each site, and a connection between them using the site-sync port and one external switch that support QinQ and MTU

No community discussion yet for this question.