Wayne configures an HTTP Security Server to work with the content vectoring protocol to screen forbidden sites. He has created a URI resource object using CVP with the following settings:

Use CVP Allow CVP server to modify content Return data after content is approved He adds two rules to his Rule Base: one to inspect HTTP traffic going to known forbidden sites, the other to allow all other HTTP traffic. Wayne sees HTTP traffic going to those problematic sites is not prohibited. What could cause this behavior?

Question

Wayne configures an HTTP Security Server to work with the content vectoring protocol to screen forbidden sites. He has created a URI resource object using CVP with the following settings:

Use CVP Allow CVP server to modify content Return data after content is approved He adds two rules to his Rule Base: one to inspect HTTP traffic going to known forbidden sites, the other to allow all other HTTP traffic. Wayne sees HTTP traffic going to those problematic sites is not prohibited. What could cause this behavior?

Accepted Answer

A. The Security Server Rule is after the general HTTP Accept Rule.

Answer

B. The Security Server is not communicating with the CVP server.

Answer

C. The Security Server is not configured correctly.

Answer

D. The Security Server is communicating with the CVP server, but no restriction is defined in the

Wayne configures an HTTP Security Server to work with the content vectoring protocol to screen forbidden sites. He has created a URI resource object using CVP with the following settings: Use CVP…

Question

Options

How the community answered

Community Discussion