Which of the following is a consequence of the portfolio definition cycle being managed well?

Question

Options

• AResources are re-allocated when required resulting in the portfolio remaining strategically aligned
• BThe portfolio governance body makes informed decisions on the composition of the portfolio
• CInitiatives will be started without considering their fit with the current portfolio
• DResources, risks and dependencies will be efficiently and effectively managed

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  7% (2)
• C
  90% (26)

Explanation

There appears to be an error in the answer key provided. Option C is almost certainly not the correct answer here - it describes a negative outcome (a failure state), while the question asks for a consequence of the cycle being managed well.

C is wrong because starting initiatives without considering portfolio fit is a symptom of poor portfolio definition management - it represents misalignment, wasted resources, and strategic drift.

The correct answer is most likely A or D:

• A is a strong candidate - re-allocating resources to maintain strategic alignment is a direct, intended outcome of a well-managed portfolio definition cycle.
• D is also a strong candidate - efficient management of resources, risks, and dependencies is a core purpose of the definition cycle.
• B describes a governance benefit that is real but more closely tied to the portfolio delivery/progress cycle than the definition cycle specifically.

Memory tip: In portfolio management exams (MoP, P3O, etc.), watch for answer choices that describe chaos or misalignment - these are traps. A well-managed cycle always produces alignment, informed decisions, and efficient resource use, never uncontrolled initiative starts.

I'd recommend double-checking your source material or question bank - the marked answer of C contradicts standard portfolio management principles and the plain meaning of the question.

No community discussion yet for this question.