Which statement about the prioritize practice is true?

Question

Options

• AA segmented portfolio should use the same criteria to prioritize each segment
• BMandatory projects should not be included in the normal prioritization process
• CPrioritization of initiatives should be based on an estimate of financial benefits that may be
• DA mandatory requirement should be reviewed to ensure that the planned change is cost effective

• A
  6% (2)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  89% (31)

Explanation

Option D is correct because even mandatory requirements - such as regulatory or compliance-driven changes - should still be evaluated for cost-effectiveness; while compliance itself may not be optional, how the change is implemented often is, so reviewing cost-effectiveness ensures the most efficient approach is chosen. Option A is wrong because a segmented portfolio exists precisely to allow different criteria per segment, since each segment may have distinct strategic goals and risk profiles. Option B is incorrect because mandatory projects still compete for resources and scheduling, so they must participate in the prioritization process - they simply cannot be deprioritized out, not excluded entirely. Option C is wrong (and incomplete) because financial benefit is only one input; prioritization should weigh strategic alignment, risk, urgency, and resource availability alongside financial factors.

Memory tip: Think of "mandatory" like a required course in school - you still have to choose when to take it and which section, so it stays in the schedule (prioritization process) and you pick the most cost-effective path to complete it.

No community discussion yet for this question.