106 · Question #107
Which of the following is NOT a main element of the benefits management practice?
The correct answer is C. Inclusion of re-appraisal of benefits in portfolio-level reviews. Option C describes an activity that belongs to portfolio-level review practice, not a core element of the benefits management practice itself. Re-appraising benefits is something that happens within periodic portfolio reviews as a broader governance function, rather than being…
Question
Which of the following is NOT a main element of the benefits management practice?
Options
- AClear arrangements for benefits tracking
- BA portfolio-level Benefits Realization Plan
- CInclusion of re-appraisal of benefits in portfolio-level reviews
- DDemonstrable senior management commitment
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A7% (2)
- B4% (1)
- C89% (25)
Explanation
Option C describes an activity that belongs to portfolio-level review practice, not a core element of the benefits management practice itself. Re-appraising benefits is something that happens within periodic portfolio reviews as a broader governance function, rather than being a defining component of how benefits management is structured and operated.
Options A, B, and D are all genuine pillars of benefits management practice: clear tracking arrangements (A) ensure benefits are monitored systematically over time; a portfolio-level Benefits Realization Plan (B) provides the overarching document that maps expected benefits to initiatives; and senior management commitment (D) is essential because benefits realization often spans organizational boundaries and requires executive authority to enforce accountability.
Memory tip: Think of the three "real" elements as the who, what, and how of benefits management - senior management (who owns it), the Benefits Realization Plan (what we're tracking), and tracking arrangements (how we measure it). Re-appraisal during reviews is a portfolio governance activity, not a benefits management building block - if it sounds like it belongs in a meeting agenda rather than a benefits framework, it's probably a distractor.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.