101 · Question #683
Why is it important that devices in a high availability pair share the same configuration?
The correct answer is B. so that application traffic can do gracefully resumed after a failover. In a high availability pair, both devices must share identical configurations so that the standby device can seamlessly take over active duties without interrupting application traffic.
Question
Why is it important that devices in a high availability pair share the same configuration?
Options
- Aso that a spanning tree loop can be avoided
- Bso that application traffic can do gracefully resumed after a failover
- Cso that configuration Updates can occur instantly between two devices
- Dso that the load can be shared equally between the devices
How the community answered
(27 responses)- A4% (1)
- B85% (23)
- C4% (1)
- D7% (2)
Why each option
In a high availability pair, both devices must share identical configurations so that the standby device can seamlessly take over active duties without interrupting application traffic.
Spanning tree loop prevention is handled by STP protocol itself and is not a reason HA pairs require matching configurations.
When a failover occurs, the standby device immediately becomes the active device. If configurations differ, the standby device would lack the necessary policies, routes, NAT rules, or session state to properly handle existing connections, causing application traffic to drop rather than resume gracefully.
Configuration synchronization in HA is not instant between devices in the sense described - the purpose is failover readiness, not real-time config propagation speed.
Load sharing (active-active) is one HA mode but is not the primary reason configurations must match; even active-passive HA requires matching configs for failover correctness.
Concept tested: High availability failover configuration synchronization
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa916/configuration/general/asa-916-general-config/ha-failover.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.