A BIG IP Administrator wants to add a new VLAN (VLAN 40) to an LACP trunk (named LACP01) connected to the BIG-IP device Mufti VLANS exist on LACPO1. Which TMSH command should the BIG IP Administrator issue to add the new VLAN to the existing LACP trunk?

Question

Accepted Answer

B. create net vlan VLAN40 {interfaces replace-all-with {LACP01{tagged}} tag 40} The command uses 'replace-all-with' which is the correct TMSH syntax for specifying interfaces during a create operation, and specifies 'tagged' because LACP01 already carries multiple VLANs - IEEE 802.1Q tagging is required to distinguish frames from different VLANs on the shared trunk.

Answer

A. create net vlan VLAN40 (interfaces add (LACP01 {lagged)) tag 40} Option A uses the invalid keyword 'lagged' instead of 'tagged', which is not valid TMSH syntax for specifying a tagged trunk interface.

Answer

C. create net vlan VLAN40 interfaces replace all with {LACP01 {untagged)} tag 40} Option C uses 'untagged' which would only allow a single VLAN on the interface - this directly conflicts with the fact that multiple VLANs already share LACP01, since an interface can only be untagged for one VLAN.

Answer

D. create net vlan VLAN40 {interfaces add {LACP01 {untagged}} tag 40} Option D also uses 'untagged', which is incompatible with a multi-VLAN trunk because untagged membership is limited to one VLAN per physical or aggregate interface.

A BIG IP Administrator wants to add a new VLAN (VLAN 40) to an LACP trunk (named LACP01) connected to the BIG-IP device Mufti VLANS exist on LACPO1. Which TMSH command should the BIG IP Administrator

Question

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion