nerdexam
F5

101 · Question #339

The drawback to having BIG-IP act as a full application proxy is the decrease in application performance.

The correct answer is B. False. The statement is false - BIG-IP acting as a full application proxy improves application performance rather than decreasing it.

Section 5: Application Delivery Basics

Question

The drawback to having BIG-IP act as a full application proxy is the decrease in application performance.

Options

  • ATrue
  • BFalse

How the community answered

(37 responses)
  • A
    14% (5)
  • B
    86% (32)

Why each option

The statement is false - BIG-IP acting as a full application proxy improves application performance rather than decreasing it.

ATrue

This answer is incorrect because the full proxy model gives BIG-IP complete visibility and control over both connection legs, which is precisely what allows it to apply performance-boosting optimizations on behalf of both client and server.

BFalseCorrect

BIG-IP's full proxy architecture is the enabler of its performance enhancements, not a drawback. By fully terminating and independently re-establishing both the client-side and server-side TCP connections, BIG-IP can apply TCP optimization, caching, compression, and SSL offloading that would be impossible in a simple pass-through or half-proxy model.

Concept tested: BIG-IP full proxy architecture and performance benefits

Source: https://techdocs.f5.com/en-us/bigip-15-1-0/big-ip-tmos-concepts/introduction-to-big-ip-tmos.html

Topics

#full proxy#application performance#BIG-IP architecture

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 101 Practice