101 · Question #2
A site wishes to perform source address translation on packets arriving from the Internet for clients using some pools but not others. The determination is not based on the client's IP address, but on
The correct answer is A. A SNAT for all addresses could be defined, and then disable the SNAT processing for select. On F5 BIG-IP, SNAT applicability can be controlled at the virtual server level, allowing administrators to enable SNAT globally and then selectively disable it on specific virtual servers tied to particular pools.
Question
A site wishes to perform source address translation on packets arriving from the Internet for clients using some pools but not others. The determination is not based on the client's IP address, but on the pool they are load balanced to. What could best accomplish this goal.
Options
- AA SNAT for all addresses could be defined, and then disable the SNAT processing for select
- BThe decision to perform source address translation is always based on VLAN. Thus, the goal
- CFor each virtual server, regardless their default load balancing pools, association with SNAT
- DThe decision to perform source address translation is always based on a client's address (or
How the community answered
(25 responses)- A64% (16)
- B12% (3)
- C4% (1)
- D20% (5)
Why each option
On F5 BIG-IP, SNAT applicability can be controlled at the virtual server level, allowing administrators to enable SNAT globally and then selectively disable it on specific virtual servers tied to particular pools.
By defining a SNAT that encompasses all source addresses and then disabling SNAT processing on individual virtual servers, administrators can effectively make the source address translation decision pool-dependent rather than client-IP-dependent. Since each virtual server is associated with a default pool, enabling or disabling SNAT per virtual server achieves the goal of applying SNAT to some pools but not others without requiring client-address-based rules.
SNAT processing is not restricted exclusively to VLAN-based decisions; it can be controlled at the virtual server level, so this goal is achievable and the statement is incorrect.
This option is incomplete and misleadingly implies virtual server-to-SNAT association is independent of pool assignment; the correct approach is a global SNAT with selective per-virtual-server disabling, not an unqualified per-virtual-server association.
SNAT decisions are not always based solely on client address or range; BIG-IP supports virtual-server-level SNAT control, making pool-based determination possible.
Concept tested: F5 BIG-IP SNAT selective application per virtual server
Source: https://techdocs.f5.com/en-us/bigip-15-1-0/big-ip-local-traffic-management-basics/snat.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.